H. Molsen & Co., Inc. v. Harp and Lovelace
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Justice.
A plea of privilege directed to a suit for declaratory judgment was overruled. Plaintiffs failed to prove their pleaded general venue rule exceptions that there existed a contract performable by, or that a cause of action arose against, the defendant in the county of suit. Reversed and rendered.
Harp and Lovelace, a partnership composed of Elbert E. Harp and Joe Lovelace, and Joe Lovelace individually filed this suit in Hale County where they resided, seeking a declaratory judgment determining the rights of the parties under two cotton crop contracts executed by Lovelace for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Employers Casualty Company v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- McCurdy v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Community Inns Franchise, Inc. v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- McKenzie Construction Company v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Resendez v. Lyntegar Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bonham State Bank v. BeadleTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Shobe v. LatimerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Esteve Cotton Co. v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Stiba v. Bowers, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Billings v. Concordia Heritage Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.