Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bajjani v. Gwinnett County School District

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 30, 2006No. A05A1781Published

1DissentAndrews, Presiding Judge

I must respectfully dissent.

1. As to Division 1 of the majority, as stated in Leake v. Murphy, 274 Ga. App. 219, 224 (1) (617 SE2d 575) (2005) “[i]f the present lawsuit alleged that the defendants had developed an inadequate plan and that the plan’s inadequacies resulted in [the student’s] injury, the defendants would be entitled to official immunity. It is the total absence of any plan which precludes dismissal of the lawsuit.”

As stated in the trial court’s order, although the complaint alleged a failure to produce a safety plan, at oral argument on the motion for judgment on the pleadings,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adams v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Teston v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Cantrell v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. IBF Participating Income Fund v. Dillard-Winecoff, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  5. Meagher v. QuickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API