Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher John Boyce

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1979No. 77-3336PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Boyce appeals from his conviction for multiple offenses growing out of a conspiracy to sell to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics information classified as top secret by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”). Boyce contends that (1) his confession and evidence found during a search of his home should have been suppressed because both were the fruit of an invalid arrest warrant, (2) his confession should have been excluded because it was obtained in violation of his Miranda rights, (3) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, United States of America v. Ronald Louis HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  2. Ziyad Abu Eain v. Peter Wilkes, United States Marshal for the Northern District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Samuel Loring Morison, the Washington Post Cbs, Inc., Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Phillip Ray JeterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Brian Donald HeldtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API