Starr v. Clapp
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
Due to his absence on account of illness, Justice Brock did not participate in this case. The remaining six justices are equally divided as to whether the plaintiff’s evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to him, makes out a case against the defendants of willful or wanton negligence. Thus, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is affirmed without precedential value in accordance with the usual practice in this situation. See, e.g„ State v. Johnson, 286 N.C. 331, 210 S.E. 2d 260 (1974) and cases cited therein.
Affirmed.
Justice BROCK took no part in the consideration or decision…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by6 opinions
- Felton v. Hospital Guild of Thomasville, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Starr v. ClappSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Alexander v. QuattlebaumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.