Legal Opinion

Wright v. Blachley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1851PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Blachley, Strong, and Simpson sued William P. Wright in assumpsit upon two promissory notes. Wright pleaded the general issue, and a want of consideration. Issues of fact were formed. The cause was submitted to the Court upon the following statement:

“ It is agreed in this casé that the defendant executed and delivered said notes to said plaintiffs, as in the declaration mentioned; that said notes were given as follows : On the 12th of March, 1841, one Eden Bedes, who was the owner in fee of the lands described in the defendant’s plea of want of consideration, being indebted to the plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leonard v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1822
  2. Harrison v. StippIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Holmes v. SchofieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wiley v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Deputy v. MooneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Griffin v. RochesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Shipp v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API