Legal Opinion
State v. Lomax
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 2010No. 2009-KA-1129PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES F. McKAY III, Judge.
| tThe defendant was charged by bill of information with two Counts; Count 1 possession of heroin pursuant to La. R.S. 40:966(C)(1) and Count 2 felon in possession of a fire arm pursuant to La. R.S. 14:95.1. Following a trial by jury the defendant was found guilty as charged as to Count 1. The district court declared a mistrial as to Court 2. The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for the possession of heroin pursuant to La. R.S. 40:966(C)(1). After a careful review of the record we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE:
On…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. GalleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. WoodberryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. CooperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. JenkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. LomaxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.