Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Holliday

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 10, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Nunn

— Affirming,

Amanda Holliday, the widow, and her children by a former marriage, are the appellants, and propounders of the alleged last will of Stephen Holliday, deceased. Her first husband was Benjamin Holliday, a brother of Stephen. The appellees are the contestants — about 25 in number — and the children of the other deceased brothers and sisters of Stephen Holliday. The contest is based on mental incapacity and undue influence. These *501questions -were submitted to the jury, and their finding was against the will. The propounders appeal.

The form of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Milton v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
  2. Meuth's v. MeuthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Lischy v. SchraderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  4. McConnell's Exr. v. McConnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Willard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dossenbach v. Reidhar's Ex'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Bodine v. BodineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Mossbarger v. Mossbarger's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Moran's v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Godman v. AulickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API