Legal Opinion
Farlow v. Vigilant Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 22, 1983No. 64849PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
Floyd E. Farlow, on behalf of himself and his minor son, filed the instant action against his insurers, Federal Insurance Company (Federal) and Vigilant Insurance Company (Vigilant), asserting one count for damages for breach of contract and a second count seeking declaratory judgment. Federal and Vigilant had denied coverage and refused to defend Farlow and his son in a personal injury action brought by Larry and Susan Sarner on behalf of their minor child who was struck by a 1979 Yamaha GT 80 owned by Farlow and operated by Farlow’s son. The insurers, in their answer in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Davis v. United American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. CrosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Southern Guaranty Insurance v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Lang v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Fokes v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Argonaut Insurance v. Atlantic Wood Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Harkins v. Progressive Gulf InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985