Legal Opinion
Woodford v. Kinney Shoe Corporation
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided February 23, 1973No. Civ. A. 16052, 16053PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIDNEY 0. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.
In these age discrimination actions, defendant has moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Since the parties have submitted matters outside of the pleadings which the court will consider, defendant’s motions shall be treated as motions for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
In the main, defendant’s motions are identical. However, in Civil Action No. 16053, which involves plaintiff Womble, defendant contends that Mrs. Womble has not met the conditions precedent to a suit pursuant to the Age Diserimination in Employment Act.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- National Screen Service Corporation v. The Poster Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Baker v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hodgson v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Broward CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Ritter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Trevino v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Anne M. DARTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Odriozola v. Superior Cosmetic Distributors Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1985
- Betty J. MOSES, Appellant, v. FALSTAFF BREWING CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Charles D. REICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOW BADISCHE COMPANY and Dow Chemical Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.