Legal Opinion

United States v. Murphy

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 14, 1927No. 2942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The merchandise imported in the case at bar was finished necklaces of imitation pearl beads. These necklaces were of two sizes, one about 12, and the other about 60, inches in length and were all composed of imitation pearl beads, strung upon cheap, but substantial, strings, without metal clasps, and were intended to be fastened about the neck of the wearer by tying the projecting ends of the string upon which the beads have been strung. The only witness called by the importer in the court below testified that these articles were sold and used as imported for necklaces.

*267The collector…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. D. Lisner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Protest 116063-K of LeightonUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  3. S. H. Kress & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Hecht Pearl Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. S. H. Kress & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API