Legal Opinion

Marvin v. Mandell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 11, 1878PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action of contract for money had and received. The answer is a general denial. At the trial, the evidence tended to show the following facts:

The plaintiff was master of the whaling ship Adeline, and the firm of Charles It. Tucker & Co., of which the defendant is the surviving partner, were the agents of the ship. Before the ship sailed, in 1869, the plaintiff bought one sixteenth part of her, and the defendant advanced to the plaintiff a portion of the purchase money. Mr. Tucker, one of the firm, told the plaintiff that they should be obliged to charge him seven per cent, interest,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hawks v. HawksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Winchester v. GlazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Starratt v. MullenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Strickland v. Bank of CartersvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Van Vleet v. SledgeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1890
  5. Marye v. StrouseUnited States Circuit Court · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API