McCarthy v. Prince (In Re McCarthy)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
This appeal from the remand to state court of a removed lawsuit presents the problem of what happens when the appellant does not provide the record that the rules of procedure require.
The appellant hamstrung himself in his effort to show that the bankruptcy court erred when he failed to designate and provide us "with the transcript of the oral findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 8006 and 8009. As the appellate record does not on its face suggest that the remand was infected by error, we AFFIRM.
Jurisdiction
Orig…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Syncom Capital Corp. v. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Franklin (In Re Franklin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1995
- Burkhart v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (In Re Burkhart)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Kritt v. Kritt (In Re Kritt)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Nilsen v. Neilson (In Re Cedar Funding, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Cogliano v. Anderson (In Re Cogliano)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Clinton v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (In Re Clinton)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Grace Community, Inc. v. KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP (In Re Grace Community, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- TIG Insurance v. SmolkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2001
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.