Legal Opinion

Holtslander v. C. W. Whalen & Sons

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1988PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order modified, with costs to plaintiffs against defendant Church, by granting a new trial as against the defendant Church and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to defendant C. W. Whalen and Sons against plaintiffs, for reasons stated in the concurring in part and dissenting in part memorandum by Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division (126 AD2d 917, 919-920).

Concur: Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Hancock, Jr. Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Titone and Bellacosa dissent in part and vote to affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holtslander v. C. W. Whalen & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Diven v. Village of Hastings-On-HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Cruz v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. O'Britis v. Peninsula Golf CourseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Trivino v. Jamesway Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Roberts v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API