Legal Opinion

Harman v. Harman

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1938No. CC 588PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

In an action on a note, the payor filed a plea setting up an assignment to him of past due alimony decreed to the divorced wife of the plaintiff. The circuit court sustained a demurrer to the plea and certified here its sufficiency.

Under Code, 56-5-4, the defendant, in a suit for any debt, may have allowed against it “any * * * set-off which is so described in his plea * * * as to give the plaintiff notice of its nature.” The statute itself does not define the nature of a set-off; but the decisions agree that the set-off “must be substantially a debt.” Baltimore & O. Rr. Co. v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goff v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Smith v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Cederberg v. GunstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. B. & O. R. R. v. JamesonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Biggs v. BiggsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Goff v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rakes v. FergusonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hopkins v. YarbroughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Korczyk v. SolonkaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Robinson v. RobinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API