Legal Opinion

In re Tan

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 2016No. 16–BG–813Published

1Per curiam

On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from the practice of law in the state of New Jersey, this court's August 26, 2016, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g), and it further appearing that respondent remains suspended pursuant to In re Tan , 119 A.3d 73 (D.C. 2015), it is

ORDERED that Herbert J. Tan is hereby disbarred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re SibleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. In Re FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In re: Robert SeguinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API