Legal Opinion

In re Tapper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 26, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee has moved for an order confirming the report of a hearing panel which recommended that respondent be suspended from practice for one year, retroactive to February 9, 1984.

Respondent was admitted to practice in the First Department on November 30, 1953. On February 9, 1984, this court suspended him and directed a hearing after the Disciplinary Committee alleged that he had been convicted of a serious crime within the meaning of section 90 of the Judiciary Law.

A hearing was held on March 8, 1984. Respondent had pleaded guilty, on June…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. In re SchleimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving HanlonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In re the Law Firm of Wilens & BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re EskinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. In re WissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API