Legal Opinion

Trinity & Brazos Valley Ry. Co. v. Lunsford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 11, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

This suit was brought by ap-pellee against appellant to recover damages for personal injuries received by him while engaged as a switchman in the employ of ap^ pellant in its yards at Teague, when endeavoring to couple two box ears to a switch engine ; the negligence relied upon for recovery being that appellant permitted its track and roadbed to become so out of repair as to render it dangerous to appellee in the performance of his duties as. switchman and without which said injury would not have occurred. Appellant answered by general denial and pleas of contributory negligence and assumed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Ry. Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Anding v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Texas & Pacific R'y Co. v. McAllisterTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Southern Kansas Railway Co. v. SageTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Neill v. NewtonTexas Supreme Court · 1859

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trinity & B. v. Ry. Co. v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Ross v. Kay Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Patterson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Patterson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Robins v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API