Stroud v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
Offense, murder; penalty, three years in.the penitentiary.
The state introduced no eyewitnesses to the killing. An undertaker and the physician who attended deceased after the fatal difficulty were introduced as witnesses, and by the physician a predicate was laid for the introduction of the dying declaration of deceased, which contains the chief incriminating facts relied, on by the state for a conviction. From this we quote in part:
“After the election Stroud and I were reading the election returns and he said he would call his part of the bet off, and I told him no, we had the bet up. I told…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McCandless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Poole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Crenshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.