Legal Opinion

Jones v. Georgia Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 17, 1923No. 14080PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The question involved is not altogether free free from doubt and uncertaint]’’, since the language of section 32 is not free from ambiguity. The provisions of the statute are remedial, and it is expressly designed to prevent industrial accidents, and to provide rights and remedies both to employers and employees under the contingencies of modern industrial conditions. Thus, in carrying out the purpose and intent of the statute, even though it be in derogation of the common law, it will be reasonably construed so as to prevent, if possible, a miscarriage of the purposes and benefits for which…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Austin Bros. Bridge Co. v. WhitmireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Noblin v. Randolph Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  3. Georgia Casualty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. Gobble v. Clinch Valley Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API