Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Conrad Banking Corp. v. Mady
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1928No. 6,363PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway
This proceeding was brought by a state bank, whose principal place of business is at Great Falls, to restrain the assessor of Cascade county from placing the bank stock of relator's shareholders in class 6 of section 1999 of the Eevised Codes of 1921, and from placing the stock in any other class than 5.
The petition shows that the bank is carrying on a general banking business in this state, with a capital of $250,000, divided into 2,500 shares of the par value of $100 each, its shares being owned and held by persons both within and without the state; that in accordance with the laws of this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- First Nat. Bank of Guthrie Center v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bank of Miles City v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- First National Bank v. Sanders CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Brophy v. PowellArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Yellowstone Bank v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1960
- Johnson v. Meagher CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.