Legal Opinion
Boultinghouse v. Lappin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 7, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1293PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Christopher Boultinghouse brings this pro se action against Harley G. Lappin in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). Plaintiff alleges that the BOP’s reliance on 28 C.F.R. § 550.58(a)(1)(vi)(B) (2000) 1 to bar his eligibility for early release under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e) (2006) 2 violates the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706 (2006) (“APA”). Compl. ¶ 1. Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Amerijet International, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- National Federation of the Blind v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Robinson v. HuertaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Roseberry-Andrews v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Arora v. Buckhead Family Dentistry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.