Lewis v. Ladner

ON SUGGESTION OF ERROR.

The decree of the court below was heretofore reversed, and the appellee's cause dismissed, 168 So. 281. The appellee now suggests that we erred in so doing.

The opinion then rendered set forth the facts of the case then and now pertinent hereto.

The appellee says, first, that while the deed executed to her by her husband, Lemuel Ladner, was one of the bases for the cause of action she here presents, it was not indispensable thereto, for another basis thereof is that the land in question constitutes a part of her husband's homestead, which homestead right she, as the wife,…