Anderson Equipment Co. v. Findley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,
The question presented by this appeal is whether the defendant in an action of assumpsit can counterclaim for damages resulting from an alleged unlawful reten tion of Ms property in a transaction not connected with the original suit.
Plaintiff, Anderson Equipment Company, sued defendant on a book account which was not controverted. As a counterclaim, defendant alleged that plaintiff was liable to him for detention of his property in another transaction. After hearing evidence on behalf of defendant, the trial judge decided that the counterclaim failed. A…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parry v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Bethlehem Borough v. Perseverance Fire Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
- Willet v. WilletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
- Balliet v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Boyer v. BullardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McDonald v. First N. B. of McKeesportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Craig v. ThoroughgoodPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1947
- Fischer v. Solomon, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1951
- Halifax Area Joint School System v. Chaundy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1962
- Welsh v. National Dime Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1945