Legal Opinion
Zerman v. Jacobs
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 2, 1986No. 80 Civ. 3570PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ernest R. Zerman, a member of the New Jersey bar, moves more than three years after the entry of this Court’s judgment against him, which was affirmed on appeal, to vacate that judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. Plaintiff’s motion is utterly without substance and frivolous. The Third Circuit’s decision in Angelastro v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc., 764 F.2d 939 (3rd Cir.1985), upon which he bases his motion, is not newly discovered evidence. The motion is denied.
Defendants cross-move to hold…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Graziani v. Committee on Legal EthicsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Vuitton Et Fils S. A. v. Carousel Handbags, and Solomon Mizrahi, Joseph Mizrahi, and Maurice Mizrahi, Additional DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Fox v. Capital Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Perfect Fit Industries, Inc. v. Acme Quilting Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 1250 24th Street Associates Ltd. Partnership v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Hyster Co. v. MoralesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991