Legal Opinion
K9 SPORT SACK, LLC v. LITTLE CHONK COMPANY
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 5, 2023No. 2:22-cv-05120Unknown
1Opinion
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY K9 SPORT SACK, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-5120 (ES) v. (CLW) OPINION LITTLE CHONK COMPANY, Defendant. SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff K9 Sport Sack, LLC filed this action bringing claims for direct and indirect patent infringement against Defendant Little Chonk Company. (D.E. No. 11 (“Amended Complaint” or “Am. Compl.”)). Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s indirect infringement claims. (D.E. No. 21). Having considered the parties’ submissions and having held oral argument on the motion…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Cheryl James v. Wilkes Barre CityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.