Legal Opinion

Copren v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1944No. S. F. 16968, 17017Published

1Opinion of the Court

25 Cal.2d 129 (1944)

JOHN V. COPREN, Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

S. F. Nos. 16968, 17017.

Supreme Court of California.

Nov. 1, 1944.

John V. Copren, in pro. per., for Petitioner.

Erwin C. Easton and Jerold E. Weil for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Petitioner seeks a review by this court of two disciplinary proceedings instituted against him upon separate charges of misconduct as an attorney at law. The charges arose out of petitioner's representation of his clients Mrs. Rosella Connelly (case No. S. F. 16968) and Mrs. Lillie Routt (case No. 17017). The show cause orders recited…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Werner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Herron v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Trusty v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Petersen v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. In Re McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API