Baltimore Sugar Refining Co. v. Campbell & Zell Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from a decree of Circuit Court No. 2, of Baltiinore City (Wickes, J.), dismissing the bill of complaint. The facts are set forth in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
The facts and circumstances out of which the controversy on this appeal has arisen are unusual, peculiar and interesting. The demurrer to the appellant’s bill makes it necessary that the facts properly pleaded should be stated with such particularity as to give a clear understanding of the principles of law to be considered and announced. The bill alleges that the appellant was in the month of February, 1890, about to engage in the business of sugar refining in the city of Baltimore, and for the purpose of properly conducting its business, it became necessary to purchase certain steam boilers…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boyce's Executors v. GrundySupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Cumberland & Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Wagner v. ShankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
3Cited by15 opinions
- Creamer v. HelferstayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Wilhelm v. Consolidated Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Conner v. Groh, Doub & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Sears v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
- Whitman v. United Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.