Legal Opinion
Ertegun v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Decided February 13, 1975No. Docket Nos. 3830-71, 3831-71, 3868-71, 3908-71Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
AHMET ERTEGUN and IOANA ERTEGUN, Et al., 1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Ertegun v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 3830-71, 3831-71, 3868-71, 3908-71.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1975-27; 1975 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 345; 34 T.C.M. (CCH) 122; T.C.M. (RIA) 750027;
February 13, 1975, Filed
Alfred D. Youngwood,Mark M. Weinstein, and George P. Felleman, for the petitioners.
Stanley Goldberg and E. Noel Harwerth, for the respondent.
QUEALY
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
QUEALY, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in the income tax of petitioners in the following…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Security Flour Mills Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- American Cigar Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.