Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Mahoff v. Matsoui

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.

This writ of habeas corpus was to secure to the relator the custody of her infant daughter, Nina, five years of age, now living with her father, the respondent. The parties met in Russia in 1919 and lived together in Russia, Turkey and the United States until 1929 without interruption, representing themselves to be husband and wife. It is conceded, however, that no ceremonial marriage ever occurred. The respondent relies upon an alleged common-law marriage to support his claim to the custody of the child. He contends that the relator is his wife, that she has renounced her duty and forsaken…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. People ex rel. Barry v. MerceinNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  3. People Ex Rel. Riesner v. New York Nursery & Child's HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Ullman v. UllmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. New York Foundling Hospital v. GattiSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gwiszcz AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Cornell v. HartleyNew York City Family Court · 1967
  3. In re NormanNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People ex rel. Lewisohn v. SpearNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In re HillNew York Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API