Legal Opinion

Williams v. Swift & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 22, 1922No. 13269Published

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The court did not err in refusing to grant the defendants’ motion, which is termed a “motion to reinstate the ease,” but is in the nature of a motion to set aside a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for the principal and interest of the promissory notes sued upon. No legal basis for such a motion appears. The record shows that the date of trial had been previously fixed by agreement of counsel, that at the time of trial the defendants made no motion for a continuance, but their counsel announced ready for trial, and that after the introduction of the plaintiff’s proof a verdict in its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Bank of BethlehemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Sparks v. Ober & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. McAnally v. Bank of AbbevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Griffin v. MayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API