Legal Opinion

Haines v. Cearlock

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Writ of Error to the County Court of Payette county; the Hon. George T. Turner, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cartwright

John H. Cearlock, one of the defendants in error, filed in the county court of Fayette county a statement in writing, under oath, setting forth that his mother-in-law, Nancy M. Haines, was feeble-minded and unable to care for her property and effects, and that the truth of such allegations could be proved by W. B. Shelton, LaFayette Case, William Berry Harris and Gebe Matthews, and praying that a commission of two physicians should be appointed to determine the truth of his statement, and that a conservator should be appointed for said Nancy M. Haines. The court appointed Dr. G. R. VanVranken…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eddy v. People ex rel. EddyIllinois Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re CashIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Compass Sales Corp. v. National Mineral Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Gersman v. CooperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  4. Snavely v. SnavelyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  5. The People v. PrpichIllinois Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API