Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Lupo

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 12, 2007No. 1050224Published

1Concurrence

I agree with the majority opinion that the Alabama Interior Design Consumer Protection Act, Act No. 2001-660, Ala. Acts 2001 ("the Act"), is unconstitutional.

I write to express concern over the State's invocation ofWilliamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, 348 U.S. 483,488, 75 S.Ct. 461, 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955):

"The day is gone when this Court uses the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to strike down state laws, regulatory of business and industrial conditions, because they may be unwise, improvident, or out of harmony with a particular school of thought."

The citizens of Alabama expect…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API