Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 1999No. CR 98-387PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1995, the appellant, William Nathan Martin, pleaded guilty to one count of violation of the Arkansas Hot Check Law by writing an insufficient check for over $200. The Court that accepted his plea ordered that he be placed under supervised probation for a period of three years. In August of 1996, Martin was arrested and subsequently charged with rape and burglary. As a result of these charges and Martin’s violation of other conditions of his probation, the State filed a petition to revoke his probation. The Trial Court, after a hearing, revoked Martin’s probation and then sentenced him to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Midgett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dodson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Coulter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Michael Clay v. Larry NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. Jarrett v. City of MarvellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Atchison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API