Legal Opinion

CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. v. Pena

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 21, 2004No. CIV.A.97-2213 EGSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SULLIVAN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

On March 31, 1999, this Court granted defendants’ Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs complaint, finding that plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge a Department of En ergy (“DOE”) award to a third-party from a statutorily-established common fund. See Consolidated Edison Co. v. Peña, Civ. Action No. 97-2213, at 10 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 1999). On appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed, holding that the answer to the question “to what is the claimant entitled under the law?” was of “direct and immediate concern to all other claimants in the fund,”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. v. Bill RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Phoenix Petroleum Company v. United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy, Hazel O'leary, Secretary of Energy and the United States, Petrade International, Inc. v. United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy, Hazel O'leary, Secretary of Energy, and the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API