Legal Opinion
Smith v. Dristig
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 15, 1929No. 27,221PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
This action is brought by Fred G. Smith and Paul L. Brown to recover the sum of $440 claimed to be owing by the defendants on a purchase of property from them on instalments. There was an amended complaint, the defendants demurred, the demurrer was overruled, a certificate of doubt and importance was entered, and the defendants appeal.
On June 30, 1925, one Mmmer and wife sold and agreed to convey to the defendants a lot in Minneapolis. On July 31, 1925, the Nimmers conveyed their right in the land to the plaintiffs. The purchase price in the contract between the Nimmers and the defendants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Warren v. WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Needles v. KeysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Andresen v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lawrence Zirinsky v. James L. Sheehan, John D. Sheehan and Brooklyn Center Industrial Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- West v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Wayzata Enterprises, Inc. v. HermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Novus Equities Corp. v. Em-Ty PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Moorhead Investment Co. v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.