Legal Opinion

Fisher v. First National Bank of Memphis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 28, 1979No. 8970PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DODSON, Justice.

The First National Bank of Memphis, Texas, instituted suit against Jimmy Roden to recover on a promissory note and to foreclose its alleged security lien against the proceeds from an agreed sale of cattle. The Bank joined Helen Fisher, who claimed ownership of 158 head of the cattle involved in the agreed sale, 1 and others claiming an interest in the alleged collateral as parties defendant. Mrs. Fisher filed a cross-action to recover the prpceeds from the sale of cattle which she claimed. The Bank moved for summary judgment to foreclose its alleged lien on the proceeds from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McBrideTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Womack v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Stowers v. MahonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Ford v. CulbertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Clovis National Bank v. ThomasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. C.I.T. Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
  2. Cox v. Bancoklahoma Agri-Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Fricke v. Valley Production Credit Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Dallas Bank & Trust Co. v. Commonwealth Development Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  5. Anon, Inc. v. Farmers Production Credit Ass'n of ScottsburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API