Legal Opinion

Haydon v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Houston Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce. Ben Haydon was convicted of an assault and battery, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J.—(1) A parent is not criminally liable in all cases merely because the punishment inflicted on his child is immoderate or excessive, and in cases where permanent injury to the child is not shown, it is incumbent on the prosecution to show that the chastisemnet was the result of malice or wicked motive. In the absence of malice or wicked motive, the parent, as to matters of discipline, “exercises pro hac vice judicial functions,” with the limitation that the punishment must not be cruel and permanent injury must not be inflicted. — Dean v. State, 89 Ala. 46, 8 South. 38; Boyd v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. CintrónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938
  2. People v. CintrónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API