Legal Opinion

Hood v. Union Planters Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 18, 2006No. 1D04-2184PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, C.J.

We dismiss the instant appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant Anthony Hood has no standing to appeal this foreclosure because he was not one of the parties named below, and made no effort to intervene. See, e.g., Stas v. Posada, 760 So.2d 954, 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Barnett v. Barnett, 705 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Appellant Roxie Hood has not filed any documents associated with this appeal and, in fact, never filed a notice of appeal in this case. Because Anthony Hood cannot bring this appeal, and Roxie Hood has not actually appealed, we hereby dismiss the entire appeal.

DISMISSED.

KAH…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnett v. BarnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Stas v. PosadaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Coral Gables v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Liliana Sanchez v. Consolidated Real Estate Investments, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API