Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gary Carson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided January 31, 2017No. 06-15-00170-CRPublished

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Justice Burgess

I agree that Carson has not waived his right of appeal under Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and that the trial court erred in relying on the Rule 404(b) notices in the clerk’s file in deciding the sentence in this case. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court’s error was structural, con*387stitutional, and/or harmful and that we are required to reverse Carson’s sentence and remand the case for a new punishment hearing. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

I. Introduction and Issues Presented

The United States Supreme…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API