Legal Opinion

Illinois Central Railroad v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 12, 1883No. 12084PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The following are the facts found by the court: I. The contracts annexed to and forming part of the petition were executed by the parties for the transportation of the United States mails as set forth in the petition. [Each contract was for carrying the mails for the term of four years from July 1, 1875, to and including June 30, 1879; and each contained the following article, which is the material part involved in the present controversy: 9th.

Read the full summary

The following are the facts found by the court: I. The contracts annexed to and forming part of the petition were executed by the parties for the transportation of the United States mails as set forth in the petition. [Each contract was for carrying the mails for the term of four years from July 1, 1875, to and including June 30, 1879; and each contained the following article, which is the material part involved in the present controversy: 9th. That the Postmaster-General may discontinue or curtail the service, in whole or in part, whenever the public interests, in his judgment, shall require…

1Opinion of the Court

*129OPINION.

Davis, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

It is admitted that tbis case differs in no material respect from tbe cases of tbe Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Eail-way Company, decided by tbis court at tbe December term, 1878 (14 O. Cls. E., 125), as supplemented by tbe Obicago and Northwestern Eailway Company’s Case, decided at tbe December term, 1879 (15 0. Cls. E., 232); both reversed by tbe Supreme Court for errors of law (104 U.S. E., 680 and 687).

Tbe counsel for tbe Government, in explanation of tbe request for a rebearing on tbe points settled in those cases, presents with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Bradley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. WilcoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee, & St. Paul Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Wilcox v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Myerle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1897
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1886
  3. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API