Holt v. Manuel
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtBtjtleb, J.
On May 5, I960, Dr. Charles S. Holt entered into a contract with the duly authorized agent of the appellees for the purchase of a lot with the building situated thereon in the city of Fort Smith, for the sum of $35,000. The property was incumbered by a mortgage which the purchaser was to assume, the balance of the purchase price to be paid in cash with a deposit made at the time of the execution of the contract of $1,000' with Eugene Henderson, agent of the sellers, which sum was to be held by him until the consummation of the sale or to be returned if tbe sellers failed to carry out the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brackenridge v. Claridge & PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Boyd v. RoaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Buchan v. German American Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Leroy v. HarwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Griffith v. MaxfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baugh v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- Donna Loyce Camp, A/K/A Donna Loyce Pearce v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Union Investment Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Vaughn v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Baugh v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.