Legal Opinion
Hood Ex Rel. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. Bell
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 8, 1936No. 4029PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
This action was instituted in the court below by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation against the defendant, Carl W. Bell, to recover on certain promissory notes aggregating $24,300. These notes had been executed by Bell to the North Carolina Bank & Trust Company and had been indorsed and transferred by-it to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, which held them as collateral security at the time of the institution of the action. While the action was pending, the indebtedness of the North Carolina Bank & Trust Company to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Stewart v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Morgan's Heirs v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Phelps v. OaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Grant County Deposit Bank v. McCampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. TischDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Anderson-Thompson, Inc. v. Logan Grain CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Kaw Nation of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Thompson v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.