Carvell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion made in 1948 to set aside a judgment and sentence in a criminal case, entered in 1937, on the ground that appellant was ■ not afforded competent counsel upon his trial. It appears, however, that the court appointed to represent appellant an experienced and competent lawyer, who entered a plea of not guilty in his behalf and represented him throughout the proceedings. There is nothing to show that he was not accorded a just and fair trial, as found by the trial judge. Appellant complains that witnesses whom he desired were not summoned in his…
2Cited by42 opinions
- Roosevelt Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Russell T. Halliday v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- Clark v. MemoloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.