Legal Opinion

State v. Mauchley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2003No. 20010551PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

1 1 This appeal concerns the corpus delicti rule. Specifically, we consider whether the corpus delicti rule should be replaced by the trustworthiness standard that has been adopted by a growing number of jurisdictions. The corpus delicti rule prohibits convicting a person based upon his or her confession alone. Stated differently, if there is no independent evidence that a crime occurred, apart from the confession, a person cannot be convicted, even if the confession was trustworthy.

12 In this case, the defendant, Brent Mauchley, filed a motion to…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State of Tennessee v. Courtney BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. PereaUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. DernSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. People v. LaRosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API