State v. Mauchley
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:
INTRODUCTION
1 1 This appeal concerns the corpus delicti rule. Specifically, we consider whether the corpus delicti rule should be replaced by the trustworthiness standard that has been adopted by a growing number of jurisdictions. The corpus delicti rule prohibits convicting a person based upon his or her confession alone. Stated differently, if there is no independent evidence that a crime occurred, apart from the confession, a person cannot be convicted, even if the confession was trustworthy.
12 In this case, the defendant, Brent Mauchley, filed a motion to…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State of Tennessee v. Courtney BishopTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. PereaUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. DernSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- People v. LaRosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.