Legal Opinion

Louisville Clothing Co. v. Harned

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 19, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Clay

Affirming.

On February 4, 1924, the Louisville Clothing Company, M. R. Harned, Asa Harned, and W. J. Jones executed and delivered to Wilhelmina B. Harned their promissory note by which they agreed to pay her on demand the sum of $2,800, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum. On August 11, 1932, there was paid on this note the sum of $1,000.

On September 13, 1927, the same parties .executed and delivered to Mr.s. Harned their note by which they agreed and promised to pay her the sum of $1,900 one day after date, with interest friom date at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Collins v. Hudson's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. City of Austin, Texas v. Trudy Leggett, Individually and as Heir of Nathan Leggett, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  3. City of Austin, Texas v. Trudy Leggett, Individually and as Heir of Nathan Leggett, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API