Legal Opinion

Smith v. Tipps

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1916No. 1677PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEESON, O. J.

(after stating the facts as above). The theory upon which appellee was awarded the relief he sought was that, as the owner of the unpaid purchase-money notes and transferee of the legal title remaining in Hightower as one of Smith’s vendors, he was entitled on Smith’s failure to pay the notes to recover the land. That appellee was entitled to recover at least a part of the land is clear, unless his suit therefor was barred by force of a provision in the act of April 3, 1913 (General Laws, p. 250; articles 5693, 5694, 5695, Vernon’s Statutes), as follows:

“Those owning the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White v. ColeTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Douglass v. BlountTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. BeckleyTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Anderson v. SillimanTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Killebrew v. StockdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. TippsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Anders v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API