Legal Opinion

Gossom v. Sharp's Heirs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 22, 1838PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Chancery. From the Circuit Court for Warren County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the Opinion of the Court in this case — in the decision of which, Judge Ewing took no part,

Gossom exhibited his bill in chancery against Sharp’s heirs &c., to obtain relief against their elder patents covering four hundred acres of land, which he claims under the following certificate, issued under the laws of this State:—

“ Warren County, set. June Court, 1801. I do here- “ by certify that Simon McNeil is entitled to four hun- “ dred acres of land by virtue of his having taken up “ and improved the same, agreeably to an act of assem- “ bly for the settling of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Galloway v. NealeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809
  2. Davis v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823
  3. Fryer v. Holder's heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813
  4. Speed v. Patton's heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1814

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Groves v. StouderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Thruston v. MastersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API