Legal Opinion
Zierke v. Molsen
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided March 2, 2022No. 4:21-cv-03187Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA GARY ZIERKE, Plaintiff, 4:21CV3187 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MATTHEW MOLSEN, and RICHARD G. KOPF, District Judge; Defendants. This matter is before the court on the plaintiff Gary Zierke’s (“Zierke”) Motion to Reconsider (filing 18), which the court liberally construes as a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment.1 Rule 59(e) motions serve the limited function of correcting manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence. United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist.,
440 F.3d 930, 933
(8th Cir. 2006).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. Mallinckrodt, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Morgan Distributing Company, Inc. v. Unidynamic Corporation (Formerly Known as Umc Industries, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Farr v. Designer Phosphate & Premix International, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1992