Legal Opinion
Stanley v. McDaniel
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided February 27, 1996No. 21912PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
A jury rendered a verdict in favor of John and Lynn Stanley on the Stanleys’ claim for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. The Stanleys were awarded $30,416.60 in damages on John Stanley’s allegation that he had been subjected to retaliatory discharge from his employment. In addition, the district court awarded to the Stanleys $15,208.30 in attorney fees and $2,265.29 in costs. The Stanleys appeal, arguing that the district court erred in not awarding greater amounts as attorney fees and costs. We hold that the district court abused…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stanley v. McDanielIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- United States v. GerkeDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024