Legal Opinion

People v. Graczyk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unani*997mously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that his sentence is unduly harsh or excessive does not survive the voluntary, knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761; People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092, lv denied 81 NY2d 1019).

The further contention of defendant that his sentence should be modified because he was under the impression that he would receive a maximum term of 25 to 50 years imprisonment is without merit. The record establishes that the court repeatedly refused to commit to a promised sentence. Moreover,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SaundersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. BachmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. Beaufort-CutnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. DOCCS/ParoleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API